Pick a rubric, drop the documents — PDF, DOCX or TXT, several at a time. The chosen rubric governs every evaluation that follows.
A shared library of rubrics — use the built-in academic rubrics or add your institution’s own criteria, available to everyone who evaluates.
Criteria with explicit weights — each rubric states what is assessed and how much it counts, so the same standard reaches every submission.
Evaluate a whole cohort — a batch of submissions is processed in minutes; every row shows the rubric used, the status and the score.
Every score carries its reasoning — the criterion, the mark, a justification that quotes the text, and the strengths and weaknesses behind it. A human reviews and decides.
Feedback ready to send — a structured summary with the strengths to keep and concrete remedies, which the evaluator edits and sends on.
The argument as a map — the reasoning in the submission is drawn as a causal diagram, so an evaluator sees at a glance how the argument holds together — and where it doesn’t.